Title: Simply the best footnotes plugin available.
Last modified: November 18, 2020

---

# Simply the best footnotes plugin available.

 *  [Eva Silvertant](https://wordpress.org/support/users/msilvertant/)
 * (@msilvertant)
 * [5 years, 8 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/too-many-errors-18/)
 * Fantastic plugin! It offers the functionality and aesthetics that I’m looking
   for. None of the other footnotes plugins could provide the broad set of features
   this plugin has.
    -  This topic was modified 5 years, 7 months ago by [Eva Silvertant](https://wordpress.org/support/users/msilvertant/).
    -  This topic was modified 5 years, 6 months ago by [Eva Silvertant](https://wordpress.org/support/users/msilvertant/).

Viewing 7 replies - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)

 *  Plugin Author [Mark Cheret](https://wordpress.org/support/users/markcheret/)
 * (@markcheret)
 * [5 years, 7 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/too-many-errors-18/#post-13589709)
 * Hi [@msilvertant](https://wordpress.org/support/users/msilvertant/)
 * we have fixed the major issues on this plugin now and are releasing new fixes
   for minor issues soon. Can you give us another try for your website?
 * Best wishes
    Mark
 *  Thread Starter [Eva Silvertant](https://wordpress.org/support/users/msilvertant/)
 * (@msilvertant)
 * [5 years, 7 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/too-many-errors-18/#post-13593325)
 * Hello Mark,
 * Some of the issues we were having, my web developer managed to fix by turning
   the plugin off on certain pages, I think. To that end, it would be nice to have
   the choice of which pages the plugin is active on, because in my case it only
   needs to be active on blog posts.
 * But the issue with the grouped links persists. For each grouped link, only the
   first two footnotes actually link to the references at the bottom; all other 
   links still don’t bring you to the bottom.
 * I will gladly give 5 stars once this issue has been fixed.
 *  Thread Starter [Eva Silvertant](https://wordpress.org/support/users/msilvertant/)
 * (@msilvertant)
 * [5 years, 7 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/too-many-errors-18/#post-13593604)
 * Also, I just noticed the numbers in the list of references are now links, and
   the arrows have been removed. Could you include an option to toggle that on or
   off? Because I thought the way it was, was perfect. I’m not too keen on what 
   it looks and functions like now. Making the numbers into links doesn’t look right,
   and intuitively I wouldn’t have guessed that clicking on them brings me up to
   the article; whereas the arrows made it immediately clear that this is what it
   would do.
 * I feel you have decreased usability with the recent update.
 *  Thread Starter [Eva Silvertant](https://wordpress.org/support/users/msilvertant/)
 * (@msilvertant)
 * [5 years, 7 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/too-many-errors-18/#post-13599340)
 * Thanks for bringing back the arrows! It makes sense to have the numbers and arrows
   linked together, too.
 * The only problem left is the dead links when more than 3 instances of the same
   reference are grouped together.
 *  Plugin Contributor [pewgeuges](https://wordpress.org/support/users/pewgeuges/)
 * (@pewgeuges)
 * [5 years, 7 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/too-many-errors-18/#post-13607629)
 * Hi [@msilvertant](https://wordpress.org/support/users/msilvertant/),
 * I’m very concerned with the issues you are reporting. I’ve tried to get each 
   grouped number individually to be an uplink, but there was a bug with increments,
   and we resigned to release an urgent, upcoming fix restoring the arrow setting.
 * I’m sorry that the arrows were so good and I removed them, but as you are pointing
   out, the redundancy was mainly in having the symbols in an extra column while
   the numbers were doing nothing (beside showing up). Using the numbers as backlinks
   was what resulted from a blog of mine first overlaying a semi-transparent ▲ on
   the numbers, and removing the ▲ symbols outright when a correspondent suggested
   doing so.
 * Whatever option is retained, one new style rule is that when a post is printed
   to a file and/or on paper to bring out some copies, the layout is without added
   arrows, just as we’re used to seeing footnotes.
 * For combined footnotes there will hopefully be a solution while personally I 
   agree too that combining notes make for a bad UX. Why so?
    1. Combined notes are too many buttons grouped together, assuming that each backlink
       works as intended. The `footnotes` way the reader can remember the number or
       letter and click on the right one when using a mouse. Not so on mobile, where
       these clusters are grouping numbers to close to each other (I’ve tried it out
       today but on a laptop). Yet remember: we should provide mobile-first design.
    2. Many combined notes in a post are sort of monotone. Some added value to each
       note would be great, such as a page number, a figure reference, or quite a bit
       of quotation. That’s how I try to make each footnote unique. Beside that, I’ve
       disabled grouping like you did. One flaw I’d fix is to have the setting in the
       first place and enabled by default. I’d rather disable it by default (that’s
       what it is in the upcoming v2.0.4). The checkbox could also be at the end of
       the Reference container settings or in Other settings.
 * But we need to support the feature working, so I’m sorry we’re not yet there.
 * As [@markcheret](https://wordpress.org/support/users/markcheret/) pointed out,
   there were many issues and fortunately some of them are now fixed, sadly not 
   all, while I think, too, that we need this plugin.
    -  This reply was modified 5 years, 7 months ago by [pewgeuges](https://wordpress.org/support/users/pewgeuges/).
 *  Thread Starter [Eva Silvertant](https://wordpress.org/support/users/msilvertant/)
 * (@msilvertant)
 * [5 years, 6 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/too-many-errors-18/#post-13679675)
 * I see the grouped footnotes bug is fixed now, so I’m comfortable using that feature
   again. I’m so happy with this plugin! I changed the rating accordingly.
 * ★★★★★
 *  Plugin Contributor [pewgeuges](https://wordpress.org/support/users/pewgeuges/)
 * (@pewgeuges)
 * [5 years, 6 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/too-many-errors-18/#post-13679999)
 * [@msilvertant](https://wordpress.org/support/users/msilvertant/)
 * We thank you for your appreciation and rating!
 * The three-column reference container has become available as an option since 
   this bugfix release 2.1.1.
 * Sorry for not thinking at making the two-column layout optional in the first 
   place.
 * Best regards,
 * [@pewgeuges](https://wordpress.org/support/users/pewgeuges/) for the Footnotes
   plugin team

Viewing 7 replies - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)

The topic ‘Simply the best footnotes plugin available.’ is closed to new replies.

 * ![](https://s.w.org/plugins/geopattern-icon/footnotes_9d9c99.svg)
 * [footnotes](https://wordpress.org/plugins/footnotes/)
 * [Frequently Asked Questions](https://wordpress.org/plugins/footnotes/#faq)
 * [Support Threads](https://wordpress.org/support/plugin/footnotes/)
 * [Active Topics](https://wordpress.org/support/plugin/footnotes/active/)
 * [Unresolved Topics](https://wordpress.org/support/plugin/footnotes/unresolved/)
 * [Reviews](https://wordpress.org/support/plugin/footnotes/reviews/)

 * 7 replies
 * 3 participants
 * Last reply from: [pewgeuges](https://wordpress.org/support/users/pewgeuges/)
 * Last activity: [5 years, 6 months ago](https://wordpress.org/support/topic/too-many-errors-18/#post-13679999)