Eugenio Petulla'

First of all, thank you for the review!

I just checked and don’t worry @sunshine4nikki you didn’t pay anything at the moment. 🙂

Did you opted-in or did you skip the registration in our system the first time you activated the plugin?

Mail us your website URL at [email protected] so we can investigate your problem.

It will work excatcly like you described in the post, if you wrap some content with the shortcode our search engine will ignore ALL the content inside it. We are planning to implement it as a shortcode just because this kind of markers are easy to detect if mixed in HTML (and this is the reason why not only WordPress used square brackets for this purpose).

Better Eg. [glossary-ignore]A lot of text mixed with some terms that we have to ignore and some HTML <a href="#" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">tags</a> that I don't want to pass to our plugin's parser[/glossary-ignore]

Talking about the workaround, I’m honestly confused because I can’t recognize this editor. Is it some sort of page builder? How the content is passed to front-end? Is it a shortcode based editor?

It looks like the builder passes the values you put inside it to front-end using shortcodes. This is not a great solution in my personal opinion, our engine actually avoids to parse links and <a> tags if you put it in the content directly (you can try with the classic WordPress editor) so it’s a very strange behavior. In first instance I thought that you had a simple <button> tag to ignore but now I understood that you have an anchor with a button class.
This depends a lot on your page builder. Page builders are the evil in my opinion because you lose control on filters priority, specially the builders that make an intensive use of shortcodes in order to render the content.

By the way, let us know what builder is so we can try to find a specific solution (if it’s open source and free) or just wait for our wrapping shortcode so you can use what you want in the page without any hassle. 🙂

@sjf I think that a class is not a viable option because people are not used to put HTML attributes directly in the content and generally it’s not a good practice to do it. We are discussing on our internal tracker about implementing a specific shortcode in order to ignore terms in the content.

Eg. [glossary-ignore]TERM TO IGNORE[/glossary-ignore]

For your last request I think it’s not possible to provide you a filter or something similar in order to be used in your functions.php because of the nature of our “term search engine” that is a very complex Regex that parses the content.

Feel free to report here all the edge cases you found and we will be happy to work on the regex in order to catch those exceptions with the engine. I hope the new shortcode will easily do the rest of the work 🙂

So YOU were not able to make it works for YOUR website and instead of open a support thread just leave a bad review on the plugin?? What’s that, a sort of revenge?

Open a thread if you want solve issue instead of dropping bad reviews out of nothing, we worked a lot on the plugin and also we are here in first line for support, but you have to be enough smart in order to ask for it!

• This reply was modified 9 years ago by Eugenio Petulla'.

I think you can try to import the terms using WP All Import plugin (https://ww.wp.xz.cn/plugins/wp-all-import/) , the only think you have to do is just to separate the items and create a properly CSV file. After done this you can import your text file into WordPress but 82.000 seems to be a lot of terms in order to perfrom a good import so maybe is better than you split the file in more small chunks or your server will be dead soon! 😉

In order to solve your broken links issue I ask you to try refresh your permalinks. Just go under your wordpress permalink settings and push the save button. Then test your term’s links again.

I’m sorry to hear about your frustration on our pricing policy and I hope you will have the occasion to get some discount for the upgrade.

Let me know if you solve the broken links issue,
Eugenio Petullà – codeat

It’s in the code, is an option that we have to add to our code in order to make it compatible with YARPP. I was just talking with Daniele, sorry. By the way… we are working on it! 🙂

Very strange behavour but I have to ask if you did clean the cache. On some server can pass a little bit more time in order it reloads, maybe you can force it by purging the cache and solve the problem suddently, give a try!