jordanwebdev

@optimizingmatters

Frank, I think you’re right, because when I try to get the score for another page on the same site, I get 98/100 and don’t see these issues about render-blocking CSS.

The biggest difference between these two pages is that the one with the lower score has a giant hero banner that is blank and shows a loading spinner until it is loaded in, and then the image fades in. I think page speed is seeing the image when it is loaded and is assuming that I am not including enough CSS to display it properly, but I don’t want to show this image until it is fully loaded and rendered.

I know this is going off topic now, but would you happen to have any ideas how I could improve this issue? Thanks for your help.

• This reply was modified 9 years ago by jordanwebdev.
• This reply was modified 9 years ago by jordanwebdev.

It’s an interesting feature that I think many people would appreciate – perhaps you would consider adding it? I actually still have a copy of the old plugin, so I was able to replicate this feature into my newer version. Would you please review it for me and let me know if the implementation is a secure? It would benefit you, too, if you were wondering how it was pulled off and/or considering adding it. All you have to do is a search for ‘poll_image’ in the file and it’ll show how it was added. Do you have an e-mail address that I can send the file to?

I found the issue was in the get variables. They are grabbing term ids, but if I change them to names instead, it works. However, for the weight range, I am still running into issues…Here is the code in question:

`<div>
<select style=”z-index: 10; opacity: 0; -webkit-appearance: none; ” class=”select” title=”Carat Weight” name=”pa_weight” id=”pa_weight”>
<option value=””>Carat Weight</option>
<?php
//$weight_value = ”;
$weight = get_terms(‘pa_weight’);
$weight_range = get_terms(‘pa_weight-range’, ‘orderby=id&hide_empty=0’);
foreach ( $weight_range as $wt )
{
$we = @explode(‘-‘,$wt->name);
$min_we = ”;
$max_we = ”;
$weight_name = ”;
if($we[1] != ‘up’){
$min_we = $we[0];
$max_we = $we[1];
$weight_name = $min_we.” – “.$max_we;
} else {
$min_we = $we[0];
$max_we = 20.00;
$weight_name = $min_we.” and Up”;
}
$weight_value = ”;
//echo $min_we.”–“.$max_we; exit;
//$weight_range_id = array();

foreach ( $weight as $wet )
{
if((float) $wet->name >= (float) $min_we && (float) $wet->name <= (float) $max_we )
{
//$weight_range_id[$wet->name][] = $wet->term_id;
$weight_value .= $wet->term_id.”,”;
}
}
//echo “

";print_r($weight_range_id);exit;
				$weight_value = rtrim($weight_value, ",");
				if($weight_value == '')
					$weight_value = 'none';
			?>
			        <option value="<?php echo $weight_name; ?>" <?php if($_REQUEST['filter_weight'] == $weight_value ) {?>selected<?php } ?>><?php echo $weight_name; ?></option>

• This reply was modified 9 years, 7 months ago by jordanwebdev.

1. The one with the bold title: “sample insurance portfolio”. It’s near the top, right under the title “Sample data files”
2. Yes. Should I be doing it in chunks?\
3. I’m not modifying them. Is there a page I can visit that explains what the CSV needs to look like?
4. I’m not sure how to do this

Thanks, that filter seems very useful!

I’m finding, though, that there are a lot of changes I need to make to template files in order to get the site looking exactly like it needs to be. The issue, then, is when WooCommerce updates template files, the client sees that WooCommerce is out of date, and rightfully so will want to update the plugin.

Just recently I noticed I had to update some template files due to a WooCommerce plugin update. Note that I did not modify the plugin directly, but instead copied the template files over to my theme and overrode them. Still, I had an issue where the review starts were displaying beside each other (looking like 10 stars rather than 5, ha!). For me I believe it was just a simple fix of updating the version numbers in my theme, and maybe deleting one template, but I don’t want a client to have to deal with this.

What is the best practise so clients don’t have to worry about these things? I’d hate for them to just not update and then they get hacked due to a security vulnerability…

Oh, that’s unfortunate. Are there any workarounds? Sometimes, it’s much easier to style an image if it’s a background. You have nice options like background-size: cover and contain.