Mike8857

@west7 thank you for the reply.

The HTML below presents the image:

<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img src="http://70.20.54.49:90/CGIProxy.fcgi?cmd=snapPicture2&usr=[USERNAME]&pwd=[PASSWORD]&t=&quot; alt=&quot;&quot;" alt=""/></figure>

But when replacing the URL above with the URL below, the image is not presented:

http://[USERNAME]:PASSWORD]@70.20.54.49/cgi-bin/snapshot.cgi?channel=15

Why should the format of the URL not be presented by WordPress?
Well the answer appears in the Inspect Element fo the browser as you suggest:
[Deprecation] Subresource requests whose URLs contain embedded credentials (e.g.https://user:pass@host/) are blocked. See https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/5669008342777856 for more details.

This is blocked in Chrome, Edge and Brave. But the image is rendered in Firefox.

I will look at this more but if I can’t embed the image as I prefer, I will create a button that brings the user to the image. That works.

I thank you for responding. Input from others creates new approaches.

• This reply was modified 4 years, 9 months ago by Mike8857.
• This reply was modified 4 years, 9 months ago by Mike8857.

Marking resolved and closed. Thank you.

I appreciate your response.

No. The problem is not fixed however I have a kinda(sic) found a workaround. I also understand the problem better.

Posting that link helped provide a workaround though it’s not perfect. Unlike Edge, IE, Safari and Brave browsers, Chrome and Firefox is where I see the problem. The problem occurs when a user authenticates to the “Members Only” area and then tries to access the page containing the code pasted in the original post. The workaround is to take that same page and make it’s Parent, Main Page (no parent) and add protection. That allows all browsers except Firefox to see the image once the user authenticates. I can live with this though Firefox is a fairly popular browser.

The core of the problem is that the cameras have a certificate that is not recognized by Firefox. That would be OK if Firefox did not force HTTPS and would allow HTTP in the url. Firefox app on my Android phone has no problem.

Again, I appreciate your response. If there some suggestion, I’d love to hear it but I’ve been all over the Internet trying fixes for the Firefox problem. It appears to be browser specific and not server specific.

Mike

@a2hostinglk – Thank you for responding. The url points to a password protected area of the web site. I posted a test user earlier but subsequently learned that this is a violation of the forum. This makes sense.

I am unsure as to where to start. As I said, the html for the cameras are “http” but when inspecting the element in Chrome, I see that the url has been converted to “https”. As you suggest, I’ll contact the service provider.

Thank you

I appreciate your prompt response. Thank you.

My problem is that I can’t find the support forum for Luzuk’s Expert Lawyer Pro. Would you please paste that URL here?

Thank you.

Hi,

Thank you for responding. Because there is a subscription cost we created an alternative solution. Rather than allowing a customer to name their price, we created 6 fixed price options.

Because this is such a minor part of our store we don’t feel the need implement Name Your Price for multiple variations.

Again thanks for responding.

RESOLVED
The mistake I was making was assuming that when a user chose a value from the drop-down, the price associated with that value would appear. Actually, a single attribute ($50) must be associated with a price ($50) and not leave it with “Any Price”.