Google schema validator doesnt find schema

Viewing 8 replies - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Plugin Author sujaypawar

    (@sujaypawar)

    3 months, 2 weeks ago

    Are you using any caching plugin which might mean, the Schema code is not yet in the cached version of your site?

    Thread Starter Seodev

    (@seodev)

    3 months, 2 weeks ago

    <script type="application/ld+json" id="surerank-schema">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https://www...

    At the Google validator I see this code, when showing the html it retrieves. So it’s there.

    Thread Starter Seodev

    (@seodev)

    3 months, 2 weeks ago

    Check your own site: https://surerank.com/

    Same result

    Plugin Support Avinash Kumar Sharma

    (@avi1020p)

    3 months, 2 weeks ago

    Hello @seodev ,

    Thank you for the details.

    Google’s Rich Results Test currently crawls only up to around 2 MB of rendered HTML. If a page’s size exceeds that limit, Google may stop parsing before reaching the schema code, which can result in no detected items even though the schema is present.

    You can read more about how Googlebot crawls and processes pages in the official documentation (last updated February 3, 2026):https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/googlebot.

    Also, our design team has optimized the site, and now the schema is visible in the Rich Results Test for our site.

    Could you please share your site URL? We’ll test it on our end and check what might be preventing Google from detecting the schema.

    Best Regards,
    Avinash

    Thread Starter Seodev

    (@seodev)

    3 months, 2 weeks ago

    @avi1020p try https://lummun.com/. It’s not larger then 2MB, plus the code is in the header not the footer.

    Also what does this mean? “design team has optimized the site”? Seems like a encoding problem this.

    Thread Starter Seodev

    (@seodev)

    3 months, 2 weeks ago

    @avi1020p https://surerank.com/ only shows FAQ markup, lots of stuff is missing

    Thread Starter Seodev

    (@seodev)

    3 months, 2 weeks ago

    @avi1020p a third reply 🙂 Just run the schema markup through AI and it will find several problems. Fix them and it might validate.

    Plugin Support Avinash Kumar Sharma

    (@avi1020p)

    3 months, 2 weeks ago

    Hello @seodev ,

    Thank you for sharing the site URL.

    I tested your URL in the Schema Markup Validator, and initially received this message:

    “The URL was not found. Make sure the domain name is correct and the server is responding with a 200 status code.”

    After that, I tested the page by directly pasting the HTML markup into the validator. The results show that the WebPage schema is properly added to your homepage.

    The Rich Results Test does not display all schema types. It only shows structured data that is eligible for Google rich results (such as FAQ, Product, Article, etc.).

    Schema types like WebPage, WebSite, and several others are valid schema types, but they are not supported as rich result enhancements, which is why they do not appear in the Rich Results Test.

    This is expected behavior and does not mean the schema is incorrect.

    If you want to validate whether the schema is correctly implemented (regardless of rich result eligibility), the correct tool to use is the Schema Markup Validator:
    https://validator.schema.org/

    For reference, Google explains which structured data types are eligible for rich results here:
    https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/9012289#enhancements&zippy=%2Cenhancements-amp-rich-results%2Cadditional-response-data

    Regarding your note about missing schema on surerank.com – the Rich Results Test will only show supported types (for example, FAQ). Other valid schema types will not appear there if they are not eligible for rich results.

    If you’re seeing specific errors in the validator output, please share a screenshot or the exact error message, and I’ll be happy to review it in detail.

    Best Regards,
    Avinash

Viewing 8 replies - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.