• Resolved theroninjedi47

    (@theroninjedi47)


    The plugin notes on github say that the footnotes were made into hyperlinks to make the plugin function when javascript is disabled. However, making them hyperlinks totally messes with normal website navigation.

    When you hit the back button, it doesn’t go to the previous page if you’ve clicked a footnote. Instead it treats every time you click a footnote or “scroll/return arrow” as another webpage in your history. So if you clicked 10 footnotes then clicked the “scroll/return arrow” 10 times, you would have to hit the back button 21 times to go back to your previous webpage.

    This makes the plugin completely unusable and I had to roll back to version 1.6.6 to get it working properly again.

    Please return to the previous system, or at least make the previous system an option. Almost no one disables javascript, but almost everyone uses the browser’s back button. (A little Googling suggests that only ~1% have Javascript disabled, and they’ll be techies who know that can cause issues.)

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Plugin Contributor pewgeuges

    (@pewgeuges)

    Hi @theroninjedi47,

    Thank you for reporting the UX issue. This has been fixed, and upcoming v2.0.4 will leave browsing history alone.

    I apologize for the trouble you experienced and for coming up with a behavior that I thought useful although the number of users relying on pure HTML/CSS is relatively small given the downsides.

    Thanks for using footnotes. Hopefully this release will meet all your expectations again.

    Best regards,
    @pewgeuges

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 6 months ago by pewgeuges.
    Thread Starter theroninjedi47

    (@theroninjedi47)

    Perfect. The update fixed the issue and it now works better than ever before. 🙂 Thank you so much for fixing it and for working on/updating the plugin. It’s the best footnotes plugin out there. 🙂

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

The topic ‘Hyperlinked footnotes creating excessive “back” history’ is closed to new replies.