Low efficient

  • Resolved Isu

    (@isuke01)


    6 years, 3 months ago

    Hey, as other ticket are opened like settngs not working, Reduced by 0 (0 saved).
    Images can be optimized using button in settings, but effects are really … not too great.
    I tried on default settings (since I cant change it) and I compered it with TinyPNG with base settings. Just picked random images.

    
              default    reSmush    TinyPNG
image1.JPG     7kb        7kb         7kb
image2.JPG     72kb       67kb        59kb
image3.JPG     77kb       75kb        40kb
image4.JPG     51kb       49kb        30kb
image5.PNG     467kb      197kb       127kb
image6.PNG     77kb       20kb        18kb

    In both cases I cant tell difference between images.
    IT is compared in default settings.

    My point is, this plugins out of box does not make any special or better experience, plus come with a lot of bugs. Im not writing review, because Im happy you are making plugin, and it is free, I understand it is a lot of work.

    But at least give me some reason to use it. now it is bugged, plus not great optimizations :/

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Plugin Contributor reSmush.it

    (@resmushit)

    6 years, 3 months ago

    Hi @isuke01

    Thanks for this feedback. Two things, from your file analysis :
    – you may consider that your original pictures are already pretty well optimized
    – TinyPNG provides in your case lower files, because they apply more destructive JPG/PNG compression. You can obtain identical or lower file size by lowering the quality settings from 92 to (example) 80

    About bugs, feel free to report if you have any particular bug, as we have more than 100,000 installations, any bug reporting is clearly welcomed. We’re really interested in those feedbacks !

    We’re hardly working on bugs reported in the support thread, to bring the best experience ever, still for free 🙂

    Best regards,
    Charles

    Plugin Contributor reSmush.it

    (@resmushit)

    6 years ago

    Hi @isuke01,

    We didn’t go any news from you since our last message, we’re closing the ticket, but feel free to open a new one if needed !

    Cheers,
    Charles

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

The topic ‘Low efficient’ is closed to new replies.