Nice project, lots of bugs!

  • John

    (@dsl225)


    6 months ago

    At time of writing this plugin is clearly not usable for online publishing.
    Too many bugs, bad suggested prompts and confusing UX and documentation – but still good (slow) support..
    There is clearly a potential but they will need time to make it really performing correctly.
    This maybe explains why it has changed naming more than once as their slug is still /gpt3-ai-content-generator/ and the title states “formely AI Poser”.

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Plugin Author senols

    (@senols)

    6 months ago

    Hi @dsl225

    Thanks a lot for your feedback.

    I’m currently managing and developing this entire project on my own, and I am continuously improving it based on user reports like yours.

    From your comment, I understand that your main concerns are:

    – Generating multiple images
    – Image prompt being automatically used as the alt text (I need to definitely fix this)
    – Default prompts needing improvement
    – UX/UI needing refinement
    – Documentation being confusing or incomplete

    If there is anything else I may have missed, please let me know. I will work on them in the next version.

    Regarding the naming: when I first launched this project back in 2022 (almost 3 years ago), it started as a simple AI content writer using GPT-3, at the time, one of the very first AI integrations in the WordPress ecosystem.

    Since then, the project has grown far beyond that: it now includes a chatbot, image generator, and other AI features. Thats why I changed the name from GPT-3 Content Writer to AI Power (AIP), because it is no longer just a content writer plugin. and gpt3 model not available anymore.

    Thanks again for your honest review and support.

    Thread Starter John

    (@dsl225)

    6 months ago

    I appreciate your feedback as it demonstrates a real commitment to develop this plugin further and I understand how hard it is.
    I have free time and I’m playing around in order to test what can be done and what not. I don’t really need this implementation yet as we are really at the very early days of AI, at least as far as content creation is concerned. People who think otherwise should reconsider their views before losing too much money and energy instead of focusing in real content generation.
    The points you highlight are correct – so far. But I suspect there are tons of others – not yet tested – to come. But I didn’t want to flood the support section here with questions and remarks.
    If you are interested, you can leave me your email, or a way to send you an initial contact form in reference with this, and I can send you more details, screenshots, prompts used and results obtained (or not) with a link to the testing site I’m using.

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

The topic ‘Nice project, lots of bugs!’ is closed to new replies.