We don’t see what I would say is sufficient questions specific to Kubrick to justify another forum do we ?
Michael has a very good FAQ, and isn’t there some sort of flickr / multiply type group too ?
If such a forum would be useful, then sure, why not but I can’t see it being so. For a whole host of reasons I’m not about to go into because to do so would be to loosen lids on cans of worms which are best kept shut, I wouldn’t vote for such a forum.
besides such a forum should be the resposibility of the template owner – and I think this holds true for any template creator – if they want to.
Tg
Gentlemen? Thank you for your input. I’m sure many of us will get something from it. However, two points:
- This was a rhetorical question. Didn’t your momma ever teach you: never answer rhetorical questions!
- This was also little more than a humorous observation on the number of Kubrick threads.
Let’s hope sarcasm isn’t dead for 2005. Otherwise I’m in big trouble.
Isnt this covered by “Templates and Design”?
maybe facetiousness is dead in 2005 😉
The benefit of facetiousness is that it can muddle along on life-support for decades.
