Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 replies - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Awesome!

    LiteSpeed Dev (@hailite)
    1 day, 8 hours ago
    Apologize for Tishu’s answer. He must misunderstand your question.

    Yes we do have that in dev plan. And its the exact main feature that we will add to next release v2.3 in next couple weeks.

    I … I think … I love you??!!??

    That’s some really great news! Lisa should write about CP-CSS & what things will be like after we have it in LSC! I always look forward to seeing her new posts. Great stuff.

    Thank YOU, Litespeed, keep up all that #KickAss, eh?

    Right?! I LOVE my LSWS & LSC. Hell, LSC is one of the Best IDEAS, much less implementations, for a Site Speed Op3imization plugin anywhere! W3TC can suck my balls (even though it is pretty darn bad ass for those who want to spend countless hours Learning what everything is BEFORE you wisely choose the correct settings ((or combination thereof, I should say)).

    Everyone knows WP-Rocket is by far the “easiest” ((That’s not true at all … neither True Nor Factual)) & guess what it does as of the last major version release? Yup, that’s right … automatic generation AND Injection of CPCSS.

    Now, I like Jonas Ohlsson Aden as much as anyone, he’s Genuinely cool ass dude who built a dope ass service … services, actually… Premium & Free. I was a premium customer who was happy with Every penny I spent with him & Hammer to (((Here is where it gets … inconvenient… COMBINE the web service with the Other plugin to combine it with Other Other plugins … just to get a SINGLE CPCSS, which doesn’t account for more than that One page from which it was taken and others like it, just not totally different post/post/customposttypes.

    so yeah, I’m with Joe.

    Understood, thank you for everything!

    That is Outstanding, @hailite, you rock! If I may, I would like to second the motion put forward by @saschinger, & ask what you think of the idea as well:

    What do you think of allowing us a check-box option… I’m thinking it would be most fitting on the LSC General Tab, categorically speaking… to allow Admins to Hide/Show the Admin Bar Button. This would accommodate not only Saschinger’s type of client, it would also be both advantageous & possibly desirable for those people that have an already crowded Admin Bar…or even if it isn’t currently crowded, could grow to be crowded & simply wish to pick & choose which options they have available at any given time.

    I believe that would be greatly appreciated in addition to an improvement in both UI & UX.

    Thoughts?

    Since you’re asking for input, I would have the icon only be a drop-down, that way there isn’t any confusion or the need to look for instructions. The only way I’d keep it as a LSC-PA Action is if you put the instructions clearly stated, preferably with an image, on the cache page, as per this Imagur link: https://imgur.com/a/fqOTh

    This isn’t my ticket (obviously), though I do want to add my own opinion to this topic as it will affect all of us:

    @hailite: I actually rather like that idea, though it made me think about it a bit further:

    The uppermost text, on the actually Admin bar itself, reads “Litespeed Cache Purge All”, with the lower settings, depending on configuration, has “Object Cache Purge All”, “OpCache Purge All”, & possibly even “CloudFlare Cache Purge All”. It got me wondering …

    Does the “Litespeed Cache Purge All” string on the actually Admin bar affect ONLY Litespeed Cache in and of itself, or does it also trigger the other three, ergo Truly a Purge ALL option?

    I think the answer to that would affect how I would view and/or feel about just the Litespeed Logo being on the Admin Bar itself. Of course, I suspect you are thinking to simply move the string on the Admin bar down into the drop-down stack, yeah? Regardless, I am indeed curious as to the actual functionality of the string option on the Admin bar.

    Much appreciated.

    will it be using LSMCD or vanilla MCD??

    Thread Starter Jason K. Dove, SEO

    (@3dseo)

    I won’t be using the tools after all. Please ignore the above request.

    Thread Starter Jason K. Dove, SEO

    (@3dseo)

    I understand all that, definitely. Much appreciated taking the time to explain it.

    I’m still getting the syntax incorrect even with a CDN address. /sigh

Viewing 10 replies - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)