beejees
Forum Replies Created
-
Forum: Reviews
In reply to: [Gutenberg] Gutenberg is terrible. Three suggestions for improvementokay, I can see your point of view @givemeausername. To be honest, the editing phase is also very productive and WordPress is not only a layout program for me. Its a wonderful CMS.
Forum: Reviews
In reply to: [Gutenberg] This editor is not developers friendlyHi @devgk, why is it difficult to disable autoformatting for a developer? And also .. you still can write your text in a simple texteditor like TextEdit and place it using the Classic Editor.
Forum: Reviews
In reply to: [Gutenberg] Great ProjectHello @tien-nguyen, yes there are extra WordPress comments (you call it HTML comments) to the content code, but its little compared to all photos and movies in a post. This matters much more and blows your database. The extra WordPress comments do not count really.
Forum: Reviews
In reply to: [Gutenberg] Gutenberg is terrible. Three suggestions for improvementHi, I use WP since a lot of years and I appreciate Gutenberg very much. It gives a lot of possibilities, the classic editor doesn’t have. I can create a modern look and layout what I was looking for (long before Gutenberg). I experienced with custom post templates. Now its much easier. This is how my workflow looks like:
I have an idea. I write the text (in TextEdit at my Mac). I collect all stuff (photos, animations, pics, movies, pdfs, etc) in my conceptional idea folder.Now, after that, I go to WordPress into the editor. Now I do all the formatting and layout and the blocks. I post the article, when I like the look and when its ready.
What I don’t do is writing, texting and breeding the idea in WordPress. That’s done before.