btaadmin

Dear Milos,

Thanks for your reply. However, some of your assumptions are plainly wrong. I’ve never had a premium version of your tables. But instead I have migrated from version 2.8.3., where “tables created manually” were supported without a subscription. These are server-side tables in SQL, as I have just checked. They didn’t have scaled down functionality, like your “simple tables” have now. For instance I was able to apply extra classes on the table in a manual mode, but I cannnot do the same on a simple table. That, if you excuse me, is an intentional design decision created to make simple tables less desirable and to force users to cough up for a subscription.

Personally, speaking on behalf of our users, I couldn’t care less how you store the data in the database. For me the desire was to be able to create a table on the front end, as my page builder didn’t offer the functionality and I didn’t want to be creating them completely by hand, as the tables might need to be edited by a non-technical staff.

So, currently I have the decision either to use an old version 2.8.3, which supposedly has vulnerabilities as warned by Wordfence. Or migrate my basic tables to csv/simple tables. Though I’m also discovering that some functionality in csv tables has now been hidden behind a paywall (as compared to v 2.8.3).

I appreciate that you developers need to make living, but $87/annually is a steep price to pay very basic functionality and literally no feature development for the most basic table creation.

I’ve just re-activated the plugin. All seems to be behaving well. Great job! Thank you.

Yes, so far. I’d thought that having a slider that integrates directly would be a great thing and it was the only reason why I subscribed.

There simply isn’t enough customisation for each slide to make Slides (the premium module) useful.