Daniel Lemes
Forum Replies Created
-
Nevermind, already found it how:
Rate_My_Post_Common::get_average_rating( $post->ID );
Rate_My_Post_Common::get_vote_count( $post->ID );Thank you. No problem, the url is https://www.memoriabit.com.br
Edit: oops. Nevermind, somehow I tried it again now and it’s connected after days trying. No idea what happened so I can’t even share a solution to anyone.
- This reply was modified 5 years, 6 months ago by Daniel Lemes.
By the way, it’s literally the same issue seen here https://github.com/Automattic/jetpack/issues/16853
Tried it too (open the authorization in new tab and new window), no success.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Nextend Social Login and Register] Missing server configuration?Thank you, finally it’s working for me. Indeed it was missing the /wp-login.php on my app configuration. IF anyone have the same problem, it’s in https://developers.facebook.com/apps/%5BYOUAPP%5D/fb-login/settings/
Thank you again!
Forum: Reviews
In reply to: [Polylang] Not friendly@sv1cec: good to know you have a good experience. My first one was kind of lame. Anyway, I will give it a second try when I have more time to let my site offline and deal with the homepage issue, since the other main plugin with similar fucntion (WPML) is paid and I can’t (better saying, don’t want to) afford one more paid plugin.
By now, I’ll keep my review. Maybe I change my mind in future.
Hello. Here, look the gap (margin?) before the first thumbnail, while the last element is perfectly aligned with the main image. https://www.memoriabit.com.br/produto/controle-sem-fio-2-4-ghz-para-snes-classic-e-pc/
Forum: Reviews
In reply to: [Gutenberg] Writers, bloggers or journalists doesn´t need this at all…No, it’s not the same. It’s not ‘JUST like before”.
Take a journalist as example, who was using WordPress for years. He or she would type the article, then add an image here and there, make alignments, etc. Now he is REQUIRED to type a block of text, then add another block only for the image, make the adjustment, and finally add another block to continue typing.
Think about this *hit thousands of times along a workflow, 5 or 6 days/week. Otherwise, the person can add a block of “classic editor” but hey, what’s the *****ng reason to remove the classic editor if the guy have to add a block of classic editor?
As I said before: Gutenberg is ok to some people, but should be an OPTION. If Automattic is so annoyed with Wix to run over their public, should at least include Gutenberg as option on blog installation, like the language.
Forum: Reviews
In reply to: [Classic Editor] make it part of coreThe idea (I guess) is that WordPress is losing ground to platforms block-based like Wix and similar crap. You know, people are lazy or can’t “waste” time learning how to use a simple CMS editor, that is not NASA technology. “Oh but but the editor is a mess, it’s ugly, it brakes my code, it this, it that”. Oh, lord…
Instead of improving the editor, the community (don’t count on me) decides it’s better to throw away a tool used by millions of people, developed over decades, to reinvent the f*c*i*g wheel… The only thing I ask now is a fork without Gutenberg, since developers are too high to listen us, the poor ignorants reactionaries who don’t know what are saying…
Forum: Reviews
In reply to: [Classic Editor] A must for all WordPress websites….BUT!Good point. It’s a help for people to get used to Gutenberg, not a forever-around solution. And when it’s done, I don’t have plans (at the moment) to use Gutenberg, I’ll look for options.
If any “powers-that-be” of WordPress community is reading this: a solid fork of WordPress without Gutenberg would be a bless. The truth is that a lot of users will not move to Gutenberg. If you think it’s cool to kick loyal old users away, you’ve done it right.
That’s weird, even the plugin doesn’t do the trick. Keeps in 640.
Edit: now the plugin is working, Wp Super Cache was the problem. Probably my theme has a 640 width somewhere. Thank you.
It’s on functions.php:
if ( ! isset( $content_width ) ) { $content_width = 800; }Same result.
I had to do it because it’s really messing up some galleries using another plugin, but it’s reactivated now.
Thanks for the response. In fact, it is possible with a RewriteRule on .htaccess, but since you’re saying it’s a violation of TOS, I’ll not publish here. My doubt was because bots/ image indexing do requisitions as any other visitors, so serving it with Photon urls would improve the site performance.
Texiwill’s snippet is working fine for me. Thank you.
Same here, no meta description. Caches cleared, no luck.