doffine
Forum Replies Created
-
Hey @usamaazad99,
thank you for your detailed answer. So we’ll just wait for you letting us know we when can update our Betas back to the new repository version then.
Have a nice weekend and thank you for your good work,
-doffineHi @usamaazad99,
over the weekend we had your beta running. Honeypot and minimum-time-to-send feature both seem to work. Both did filter out spam messages. Nevertheless we got a single spam message, obviously by a bot that 1) doesn’t fill in the honeypot, that 2) didn’t send the form too fast and that 3) was able to answer our quiz question that we set up as a third security measure. We now changed the quiz question from an easy calculation task (1+5?) to a little more sophisticated question and will see what comes out.
We have some more question:
1. Will the beta version we installed be auto updated like regular versions, as soon as a new version will be available here in the ww.wp.xz.cn repository?
2. What did you change in the beta? Is it plausible that your changes did fix malfunctioning honeyport or time-measure functions?
3. Are you still trying to improve something relevant for this topic at the moment for a second beta – and if yes, what is it?
4. What else could we do to bot-protect our forms better than just using honeypot/time measure/quiz quesiton and without using external services like ReCaptcha, Turnstile & Co.?Thank you very much for your great work and support,
-doffineHi @usamaazad99 ,
thank you for your feedback! We are currently testing the update and need the weekend to verify that everything works as expected. We will get back to you after the weekend with an update.
In the meantime, we would like to provide some additional information and a screenshot that may help you troubleshoot the issue. We submitted the screenshot via your support form at https://objectsws.atlassian.net/servicedesk/customer/portals and included a link to this support thread in the request.
Hi @wfmargaret,
ok thank you very much for letting us know. If such a more granular possibility of the settings is nothing you would implement in the UI, perhaps you can think about adding some filters that interested users could integrate into the functions.php file. You wouldn’t have to change your UI for everyone, but we could switch on and off notifications more granular then. We guess it cannot be too hard to implement such filters for single events to switch mail notifications on or off. But of course switches in the normal settings would be more comfortable.
Thanks again,
-doffineHey @wfmargaret,
thank you for coming back to us so quickly. When I look on the alerts list you provided above, I see…
- under medium “An abandoned plugin is installed” and
- under critical “A plugin removed from the ww.wp.xz.cn repository is installed”.
What is the exact difference between both of them? Is an “abandoned” plugin a plugin that still is to be found in the ww.wp.xz.cn repository but didn’t receive any update for a specific amount of time?
I can do without the rest of the “medium” alerts, but if there was an abandoned plugin (that didn’t get updates for long) I indeed would want to get notified about that.
So it stays: As far as I could read, older versions of Wordfence had the possibility to switch off just those “update is available” mails. Now we would have to switch off way more. Every agency should have a working update process to keep all installations in view and up to date – and so do we. We don’t need another plugin telling us things via mail we already know. But we would not want to do without a Wordfence mail telling us that plugin XY hasn’t received any updates for 3 years or so.
Greetings and thank you again,
-doffineForum: Plugins
In reply to: [PDF Generator for WordPress] Change relative links to absolute linksHi @wpssupport,
ok, we’ll do so. Please let us know how/where to do this. Keep in mind that we are using the free version of the plugin if that matters.
Thank you a lot,
-doffineForum: Plugins
In reply to: [PDF Generator for WordPress] Change relative links to absolute linksHello @wpssupport,
it’s us again. We discussed this problem in our team and still see a problem. The following is the problem:
- We have a website that uses relative links as hyperlinks.
- We export that page with your plugin to a PDF and save it to disc. Then we open it with Acrobat Reader.
- All relative links – let’s say /impressum/ – are shown as file://impressum/ in a current Acrobat reader and thus don’t work.
We would expect that relative links in a website should be auto-converted to absolute links https://www.domain.tld/impressum/ when they are put in a standalone PDF file that doesn’t know anything about the domain of origin.
The way it is now, every relative link in a PDF file generated by your plugin has broken links. Can you again help us with this?
Many greetings and thanks for your work,
-doffineForum: Plugins
In reply to: [PDF Generator for WordPress] Change relative links to absolute linksThank you for this tip! I looked at this again and found out that it was the official Adobe Acrobat Extension in my browser that handles relative links incorrectly. If I deactivate the extension, the relative links are handled as absolute links!
Thanks again for clarifying!Hi @jarnovos,
please allow us a further question:
When you publish the update, will it also fix all .htaccess files that are broken at this moment? Or do we have to manually re-save all permalinks after your update to make sure everything is ok in every of our 250+ websites?Greetings,
-doffineHello @jarnovos,
we just sent you the mail with the information you asked for.
As said our agency maintains 250+ WordPress installations all having your plugin. Even after 9.5.0.1 we continuously have websites down (all subpages but not the front page) because of the missing WordPress-part in the .htaccess that still erratically gets auto-deleted by your plugin. That is a situation that may not persist. It is a severe problem we think you should urgently fix considering your huge installations base. Your plugin might be responsible for thousands of websites going down. If you cannot fix this asap please consider an update of your plugin reverting your changes that led to this huge problem until you find the issue.
We are waiting for your reply – of course, thank you for your work!
-doffineForum: Plugins
In reply to: [WP Table Builder – Drag & Drop Table Builder] Bug(s?) in versions >2.0.7Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [WP Table Builder – Drag & Drop Table Builder] Bug(s?) in versions >2.0.7Hi @protibimbok,
would you give us a mail address or something like that so I can send you the link without making it public? Our customer does not want to find his domain in public support forums.
Greetings,
-doffineForum: Plugins
In reply to: [WP Table Builder – Drag & Drop Table Builder] Bug(s?) in versions >2.0.7Hi @protibimbok,
since it is a customer’s website we are forced not to make information public. Would you give us another way in which we can share information with you?
And second: What exactly do you need? A frontend link where the table is to be seen in the website, or a database dump of some tables (which ones?)?Greetings,
-doffineForum: Plugins
In reply to: [WP Table Builder – Drag & Drop Table Builder] Bug(s?) in versions >2.0.7Hello @protibimbok,
ok, we just updated to 2.0.10 and still notice issues with saving already existing tables.
Problem:
- We edit an old table that already existed before we updated the plugin. If we try to save this edited table we get the message…
Table saved successfully!
…but directly below that we see an error message saying…Table save failed: number 0 is not iterable (cannot read property Symbol(Symbol.iterator))
The outcome is that the table didn’t get saved/changed. - If we edit an old table and just directly click on “save” without having done any changes to the table, we also get the message…
Table saved successfully!
…but directly below that we see an error message (differing from the one above in 1.) saying this time…Table save failed: (destructed parameter) is not iterable - Creating new tables does work without any problems. When we edit a new “2.0.10” table, this also works without any problems. So only saving old tables seem to have this problem.
- Clicking on the “Responsive” tab on the top left works without any problem in 2.0.10 (didn’t work in 2.0.8 and 2.0.9 and is now ok).
If you should have further questions, just ask.
Greetings and thank you for your good work,
-doffineHello @addonpro,
we just checked it and yes – it works now. Thanks for fixing the issue so quickly.
Greetings,
-doffine