Daniel
Forum Replies Created
-
Thank you so much nosilver4u,
you are great, just let me know if any day you need some help
That could be the cache of the LiteSpeed server. I have been doing some testing so anything can happen when caches are around 😉
Lighthouse did not tell me that I had to use nextgen formats for images, it was me that I believe having WebP format I would avoid some warnings.
And, yes, I have cleared out the large WebP images
Hi,
I have tried to low down the quality value as you have said, I have even tried with 20 but the WebP image does not get converted and also the size of the jpg is still the same one.
The only way to convert the WebP image is to check the option “Force WebP” and once is create I have unchecked it. The result is a 66K jpg image and 106k WebP image, so it does not make any sense to have a WebP image bigger than a jpg. I have also tried to convert the same jpg in other online platforms and I get even worse conversion result.
The only thing that comes to my mind is to upload an smaller jpg image. This is the site where I’m doing all mentioned before by the way https://www.tudestinopirineos.com/ and here it is where we can see the lighthouse warnings https://www.tudestinopirineos.com/actividades/aventura/
Thank you so much for your help, always learning about how to optimize websites.
Have a good weekend.
And also, I’m using OpenLiteSpeed, just in case a weird .htaccess rule does not work, which I don’t think so, most of them are working fine.
To make a webp image a bit smaller or even same size would be great so it is work for any image. Actually, as far as I’m concerned webp should be always smaller than jpg keeping the same quality.
Ok, great. I’ll be connected and checking the post.
Thank you 😉
Ok, thank you so much for the advise, I’ll really consider it 🙂
Hi, thank you for the answer.
I’m trying to do this because lighthouse is giving me a slow score because I’m not using webp for some images, which are those images not converted.
And also seeing that the option “Force Web” seems to use javascript and most of the pages are done in AMP so this javascript will not have effect. I could check the option just to create the webp images and after that uncheck it 🙂
I’m going to try with a couple of images and I’ll let you know.
Thank you!!
Hi, how are you doing? I Hope everything is ok.
I would say that you should release a minor version as soon as possible with at least this fix, otherwise you are going to leave many websites displaying the warning message, including many of mine which I develop for some clients. I use your plugin and it does make any sense to leave it like this if you already have the solution. In my opinion this is something to be considered a big issue. I was very comfortable but I have just started to check other plugins.
Thank you.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [AMP] Images are not loading correctly@jamesosborne you are the best.
I did not remember that I was working in a multisite so the plugin EWWW was as “Network Enable”, I deactivated and everything works perfect. Actually I have found the rule from EWWW which breaks the behavior of the images:
On the settings of the EWWW plugin, on the “Webp” tab there is an option which says “JS WebP Rewriting – Use this if the Apache rewrite rules do not work, or if your images are served from a CDN.” So don’t select this option if you work with AMP because is using some javascript to serve the webp images.
I came back to standard mode and everything ok, I can keep developing the site https://test.simpledevel.com/thebluelaundry/
Thank youu @jamesosborne , have a nice day
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [AMP] Images are not loading correctlyHi @jamesosborne,
no problems with the delay.
I have set 3 images: one with only the layout attribute, another with layout and lightbox and the third one with no attributes, I hope it helps you.
https://test.simpledevel.com/thebluelaundry/images/?amp
Thanks
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [AMP] Images are not loading correctlyHi again,
Well, definitely images don’t work using the plugin AMP, they show up but none of the attributes get effect, I have to do it manually introducing a custom html block.
I hope you can see something, thank you.
Have a good day.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [AMP] Images are not loading correctlyHi James, thank you for answering, I knew about the additional image options, this is exactly what I mean, I’m using them, I’m not adding any additional or modifying anything.
I have change the mode to “transitional” and still the image is not having the responsive and lightbox effect.
https://test.simpledevel.com/thebluelaundry/images/?amp
Thank you.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [AMP] Add google font in the footerHi guys @westonruter and @jamesosborne , thank you so much for your help.
@jamesosborne
As you are using amp in standard mode I can’t compare the results, but your server setup could have an impact also.
It is in standar mode, yes, and the server is an amazon VPS which is quite fast and I’m also using LiteSpeed web server with LiteSpeed cache plugin so everything goes very fast, actually I have done some tests with a page a part from the WordPress and I got almost 100 performance.Nice work with the site, you made good use of different amp components.ThanksAnd yes @westonruter I have tested also the AMP cache testing as you have mnentioned “https://test-simpledevel-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/test.simpledevel.com” and I got more or less same score.
As far as I’m concerned the fonts and the AMP scripts (such carousel, fit-text, observer) mess up with the performance of the page speed testing, I have tried other sliders mainly css and a little bit of javascript and they do better. I guess this is something which will get better.
I didn’t have plenty of time today (lot of work) to try it out all the info you mentioned @westonruter so I’ll check it and let you know, but I have tried the “preconnect” filter, I have seen it taken effect on the site but it did not get better pèrformance. For the moment I’ll leave the filter activated. And well done with opening the PR.
Have a nice day 😉
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [AMP] Add google font in the footerHi Westorn,
thank you so much for your answer, clear enough.
Well, I’m having worse score using AMP compared to other pages which do not use AMP. AMP is supposed to make the web faster but in my case I’m getting the opposite.
This message:
The Critical Request Chains below show you what resources are loaded with a high priority. Consider reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load Maximum critical path latency: 730 ms Initial Navigation /test.php(test.simpledevel.com) …fonts/dashicons.woff(test.simpledevel.com) - 300 ms, 25.77 KB …v14/3qTvojGmg….woff2(fonts.gstatic.com) - 10 ms, 11.28 KB /css?family=…(fonts.googleapis.com) - 30 ms, 1.13 KB …fonts/fontawesome-webfont.woff2?v=4.7.0(cdnjs.cloudflare.com) - 50 ms, 76.01 KBis making page speed much slower. I don’t know yet how to fix it, or maybe there is no way, it is just like that.
I’ll keep investigating but if anybody knows anything, please enlighten me 🙂
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [AMP] invalid_element:Super James, that’s our man,
and that’s the stuff -> The <amp-sidebar> should be a direct child of the <body>
As you have mentioned on your previous comment, the anp-sidebar has to be a direct child, I was wrapping it with another tag and I did not realized.
So the pluin is doing great, it was all on me, I missed this little point which got quite big. Well, I hope this useful for someone.
Thank you so much for your help James, it was a pleasure.
Big hug and enjoy life.