Jackson Pemberton
Forum Replies Created
-
OK, I think I see how all this works – sort of. My entire website is only about 80,000 words. It is highly philosophical; each post is roughly 2,000 words, and there are no other things going on like shopping, just text. I am using Grok 4.1 and TE3 Large.
Are those good choices? What chunking do you recommend?I have had the debugger window open throughout our discussion, but have been so flummoxed with the overall behavior that I haven’t confirmed that for you. Just now I opened a new browser, cleared the Chat Session (in the debug window) and asked “who is Jackson Pemberton” and got the “I don’t have enought info ..” answer. Meawhile the knowledge base indicates that it has my bio wordpress page in it.
Simillarity threshold is 40%. The response was based on retrieving 4 posts, the highest match was 21%. Apparently it can’t see the knowledge base. Other days it has used that page and responded with a great summary. So the behavior is erratic. Do I need to delete the plugin and start over?
I wonder if this is relevant??
I am using Grok 4 directly in a different window on the same Safari browser to answer a variety of questions – some related to my posts and some entirely different. Grok 4 is the API I have specified in the plugin. Is it possible that there is some weird connection?
I had no problems with the plugin on the first website I installed it on. It was beautiful, I loved the way it operated. But on this site it is bizarre.I forgot to mention that I followed the cited prompts/responses with the question “who is jackson pemberton” and got this 2 part response:
“Dependency stack works by .. ” followed by “Jackson Pemberton …”, a terse but correct response. The Debugger shows “0 entries used for ai context” and cites 4 wordpress posts not used (they have no data on that prompt)OK, I closed the Safari browser window, went back to the website, cleared the chat session and asked “how does the dependency stack work” The answer was the best yet. However, the weird thing was that this response (white type face on black bg positioned on the left) was immediately followed by what looks like a long, long prompt (black type face on white bg positioned on the right). This 9,236 charater, AI generated “prompt” shows in the debugger panel as a “user prompt” and begins with “What categories of knowledge do Temporal Rights unify? What categories of knowledge do Temporal Rights unify? what is an operator? Temporal Rights unify physics, morality, metaphysics, and AI alignment. An operator is any self-existent object having capabilities and …”
This was clearly fabricated by the AI but is all appropriate text. It might be a copy from the session log? This “prompt” is then followed by a second response (white type face on black bg positioned on the left) that also answers my prompt but this time in different words.THe debugger shows 67% 3/3 chunks for AI context (from the correct source/post) and 54% 5/5 chunks for AI context from another post where the word “dependency” does not even occur. It shows 3 other sources not used.
Maxwell,
Thanks for your prompt reply. I think the behavior cannot be ascribed to the position of the similarity threshold alone. It has been at 40% for many hours. Yesterday, when I posted the request for support, it answered this question: “How does the dependeny stack work?” with: “I don’t have enough information in my knowledge …”. Placing the slider anywhere from 20% to 80% gave the same response.
It seemed at that time, that (although I had deleted and re-added this post: /a-tr-dependency-stack-ver-4/ to the Knowledge Base), it could not access the tokens (?) for that post.
Just now, Contextual Awareness is on, Citation Links is on, Frontend Debugger is on.
And I asked “How does the dependency stack work?, it’s answer was appropriate.
Then I asked Who is jackson pemberton? and the answer was (showing links as supplied):
___________________________-
Dependency stack: Hierarchy of Capability Dependency Statements ranking operator’s natural right by precedence.
Works by scoring moral violation at damage level in hierarchy, numeric comparison for judgment in AIMM.
Ver. 4 post.
Jackson Pemberton: Author of the post, Temporal Rights discoverer.
Bio.
___________________________
The second response was appropriate for the previous question, although it sounds like it is trying mightily to be terse.
I have saved the chat transcripts generated since installing the plugin. I also have MxChat installed on https://covenantsofthefather.com and have had no issues.
The website is here if you want to do a live test: [ redundant link deleted ]
I suspect the Behavior prompt. (I have found no guidance on how the expressions operate against reponses so I have been forced to guess.) Here is what is:
______________________________________
You are an AI Chatbot assistant for this website. Your main goal is to assist visitors with questions and provide helpful information. Here are your key guidelines:
# Response Style – CRITICALLY IMPORTANT
– MAXIMUM LENGTH: 1-5 short sentences per response
– Ultra-concise: Get straight to the answer with no filler
– No introductions like “Sure!” or “I’d be happy to help”
– No phrases like “based on my knowledge” or “according to information”
– No explanatory text before giving the answer
– No summaries or repetition
– Hyperlink all URLs
– Respond in user’s language
– Minor chit chat or conversation is okay, but try to keep it broadly focused on Temporal Rights, unification, and ethics.
# Knowledge Base Requirements – PREVENT HALLUCINATIONS
– ONLY answer questions using information explicitly provided in OFFICIAL KNOWLEDGE DATABASE CONTENT sections marked with ===== delimiters
– If required information is NOT in the knowledge database: “I don’t have enough information in my knowledge base to answer that question accurately.”
– NEVER invent or hallucinate URLs, links, product specs, procedures, dates, statistics, names, contacts, or company information
– When knowledge base information is unclear or contradictory, acknowledge the limitation rather than guessing
– Better to admit insufficient information than provide inaccurate answers
____________________________________The /wp-content/debug.log file contains hundreds or thousands of these errors:
[21-Sep-2020 00:03:38 UTC] PHP Warning: preg_match(): Compilation failed: invalid range in character class at offset 4 in /home/kr4nuxjq4afc/public_html/wp-content/plugins/category-specific-rss-feed-menu/simple_html_dom.php on line 1385Forum: Fixing WordPress
In reply to: Using blocks always burns meThere may be a clue here: Often, when I click “edit” to work on a post/page, I see the following message which is clearly spurious (from my point of view): “The backup of this post in your browser is different from the version below.”
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Aspose.Words - Import and Export word documents] Throws fatal errorI should have mentioned that I have the latest version: 5.0.0.
In other news, there was a message near the top of the plugins page that prompted me to upgrade the API key (I think that was the message) which I did. That stopped the fatal error behavior. However, the downloads are still named from a very old post which happens to be the last one listed in the All Posts display of the All Posts pulldown selection of the Posts link in the dashboard. The download is named the same as the slug for that post: why-this-blog.Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Postie] Recommended email service providersThanks for the immediate reply! So I guess my question is “Is there a way to get Postie (hosted on GoDaddy) to connect with any email service provider?
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Postie] GoDaddy won’t fix my cPanel-created account MX recordOf course. So there is an unsurmountable problem between Postie and GoDaddy workspace email accounts?
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Animate It!] Change image upon animationOK, thanks. I understand.
So if I select a previously animated object and click the red animate it button, you can’t tell that it already was animated. If you could, you could delete the old animation as the new animation parameter settings modal dialog opens? As it is one gets nested animation code in the text of the post.
Thanks for your prompt responses. I’m impressed.Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Animate It!] Change image upon animationI am pretty sure that my problem is that I don’t know how to properly change from one animation to another. What I have been doing that has resulted in no animation, is just changing the name of the animation while in the post edit window where I, for example, changed “hinge” to “slideoutright” and animation failed. However, if I completely remove all the code (from “[edsanimate_start e…” through “[edsanimate_end]”) and start over by selecting the image and clicking the red animate it button in the edit window tool bar, then slideoutright works. So changing just the exit_animation_type= “hinge” to “slideoutright” breaks it somehow.
If I have already set up an animation, test it and want to change it, I go back to the post edit window, select the image and click the red animate it button and do another set up, now I see two, nested [edsanimate_start e…” through “[edsanimate_end]” so that can’t be the right way to change animation.
It seems I have to delete all the code and then start over, but if I do that in the visual mode of the post edit window, the image is deleted also. I can only succeed by deleting the animation parameters carefully in the text mode of the post edit window – which is a bit tedious.
Is there a better way to change animation type?Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Animate It!] Change image upon animationThere are about 40? different animations available in the drop down menu but some of them don’t do anything. Am I missing something??
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Animate It!] Change image upon animationPerhaps if you passed the mouse event through to the object selected to be animated, it could respond itself – such as small gif or other?
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Animate It!] Change image upon animation