Julianwave
Forum Replies Created
-
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [wp-Typography] partial widow controlok thanks. i might do that.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [wp-Typography] partial widow controlpro version
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [wp-Typography] partial widow controlI’m using the latest version of everything.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [wp-Typography] partial widow controlIf I remove the “add_filter” code then my acronym does not get the “caps” class. However if I re add the “add_filter” code then it does get the “aps” class added. However it is then that the captions disappear etc.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [wp-Typography] partial widow controlIf I do that, the captions etc reappear, but presumably wp typography is no longer doing anything at all to any of the acf content?
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [wp-Typography] partial widow controlI have made sure the unwanted p tags are removed, and reenabled wp typography, but still get the same problem.
Which extra code in functions.php should be disabled?
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [wp-Typography] partial widow controlAs I have disabled the plugin I can not show you a real example, especially as the site is not live. However I can tell you as closely as possible what seems to have happened, as far as the captions are concerned.
I will go through it methodically.
I have some acf wysiwyg fields.
If I add content to them, including images with captions, and with wp typography turned off, the images and captions appear as they should, wrapped in figure tags. eg
<p><figure id="attachment_78" class="wp-caption alignright fig-right" style="width: 1701px"> <div class="wpa-ld img-right wp-image-78 size-full"> <img id="longdesc-return-78" class=etc.
However, with wp typography turned on, the images appear, but without captions, and not wrapped in figure tags, eg
<p><div class="wpa-ld img-right alignright wp-image-78 size-full"> <img id="longdesc-return-78" class=etc.
I realise that the whole thing should not really be inside a p tag, however WordPress seems to be doing this by default. COuld that have something to do with it?
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [wp-Typography] partial widow controlQuick update – I have had another problem. With wp typography enabled, and the code…
$typo = WP_Typography::get_instance();
add_filter(‘acf_the_content’, array( $typo, ‘process’ ) );`…added to functions php as recommended, I found captions to images stopped appearing.
When I looked closer, captioned images added with the acf wysiwyg were no longer wrapped in a figure tag as they should be.
I was also getting a “white screen of death” problem when I tried to deactivate the plugin. Eventually, removing the plugin from the plugins folder manually, and deleting the code from functions php fixed that.
As I use a lot of acf, I think I had better keep wp typography turned off for now.
It’s a great idea, I hope you continue to develop and improve it.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [wp-Typography] partial widow controlThanks for the quick reply. My site is only on mamp at the moment so I have nothing I can share. Basically I have 4 acf wysiwyg fields on a page. for 2 of them the widow control seems to be working, for the other 2 it seems to have no effect. It seems to be something to do with either the html or the css, because the 2 that work have a different layout and css to the 2 that don’t. When I get it online I will share it so you can see. I am trying out using acf for most of the layout, including the main content, so it is acf fields specifically I am referring to.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Clone] Plugin No longer works?yes, dead for me too. And no responses in the forum. I reckon they have just abandoned this plugin.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Clone] blank pageMe too! Well, I get the black top bar and black nav bar on left, and the rest of the browser window is just blank with a grey background.
Forum: Accessibility
In reply to: Accessibility toolsI’ll bear that in mind, thanks. I do aim to make sites that are accessible by default – using the plugin was meant to reinforce accessibility rather than compensate for faulty code, but maybe I don’t need it that much after all. I will need to take a closer look. Anyway, I think I have a much clearer position on accessiblity button tools now.
Forum: Accessibility
In reply to: Accessibility toolsThanks for replying Joe,
That’s very useful. I agree with you, the only thing is that a few years ago we had some user testing done on a site, by people with low vision issues, and they were in fact pleased to have accessibility tools on the site we were building. If I remember correctly, one of them said that although they knew how to use browser controls to alter the appearance of the page, it was quicker and more convenient to have them within the page itself. They were also of the opinion that a lot of low vision users still did not know how to customise their browser view, which surprised me.
So I still think that there may be some use for these kinds of tools on sites that have a large number of low vision users, but that in most cases this is outweighed by the clutter.
Also, as you say, if nothing else it shows clients that you are taking accessibility seriously!
Forum: Accessibility
In reply to: Accessibility toolsThanks for the reply.
I will have a look on w3c and see if they say anything specific about the js “accessibility tools” as mentioned above.
Forum: Fixing WordPress
In reply to: hacked siteI downloaded a copy of the site before i restored it. As far as I could tell, the only changes were the addition of a new theme and the changing of all the root level files, as described above.
My computer is a mac, but I am not the only person who can login, there are about ten others users.
I will be asking the isp to check any server related issues tomorrow.
Thanks for the advice.