Meitar
Forum Replies Created
-
MIME support for this was requested years ago but I never found the time or other resources to work on its implementation. You have three options: implement MIME support in the plugin, fix inline support in your client, or use a different client. That’s really all there is to it. Shrug?
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [WP PGP Encrypted Emails] Special char encoding (UTF-8)If I remember correctly, UTF8 encoded email that is encrypted is still processed correctly, you just need to include the appropriate Content-Type MIME type header via CF7’s custom Header feature. Or, to put it another way: make sure that your email client understands that the content is UTF8 encoded by telling Contact Form 7 to say so explicitly in the message it ultimately generates. If that doesn’t work, you may have found a bug, and you should submit a bug report that is complete enough to be actionable.
Great, thanks. The next version of this plugin will pin the dependency to that version. There is no difference between that tag and the current deployed code, so this doesn’t yet warrant a plugin version increase.
Yeah, the upstream library “works” with PHP 8.0, but that’s not the only consideration. There is no tagged release upstream with that codebase, so I can’t easily reference that specific commit history from Composer. I’ve just used the
dev-masterref for now, but that’s suboptimal for a lot of reasons.Yeah, this is a known issue in the upstream library so supporting ECC is not a trivial ask at this time.
I’m also aware of the PHP 8.0 errors as reported earlier but again, I’m waiting on an upstream release in order to fix that. If you would like to help, nudging the upstream library maintainer to tag and release a new version so I can pull it in via my Composer set up, that would be helpful. Thanks.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [WP PGP Encrypted Emails] Download Public Key gives errorThe image you shared shows you are trying to load a
.partfile; an incomplete download. I don’t know what you’re doing to cause that but it is certainly not something I will be able to help you with.Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [WP PGP Encrypted Emails] wordpress website breaks with a php fatal errorOh, that’s disappointing. π I’m now using the latest released version of the upstream library so if that error is still there we’ll have to wait until the upstream library cuts a new stable release with support for PHP 8.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [WP PGP Encrypted Emails] wordpress website breaks with a php fatal error@costlib, will you please test the latest tagged release candidate, version 0.7.5 to ensure it works in your environment? This version updates the dependencies and should support PHP 8.x versions. Once you let reply letting me know it works, I will make this version an automatic update.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [WP PGP Encrypted Emails] wordpress website breaks with a php fatal errorThis error indicates an upstream library is incompatible with the version of PHP you are using.
I’ll have to see if this has been fixed upstream and if so update the version of the library this plugin uses. Thanks for letting me know. Hopefully I can get a fix released in the next few days.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [WP PGP Encrypted Emails] Is there a minimum OpenSSL version needed?I would be surprised if an update to the OpenSSL extension on your hosting provider would fix this problem; it’s recent enough that it should work. I would continue to look at other possible causes if I were you, though I don’t have any specific advice for where you should look.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [WP PGP Encrypted Emails] Only Admin has PGP key fieldOnly the original Admin has a PGP key field. Second Admin does not. Subscriber and Editor does not.
They do. Log in as them and see for yourself.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [WP PGP Encrypted Emails] HTML Email aestheticAny chance to get an update to scrub the HTML tags out of the emails?
No. This is easy enough for you to do with a small modification to a theme’s
functions.phpfile, for example, anyways.Might be able to βDonateβ a certain amount depending on the recommendation.
That’s not what “donate” means.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [WP PGP Encrypted Emails] A not updated good pluginWhat warnings is your site generating? Post them here or file an issue report in the project’s issue tracker and I’ll have a look.
The reason I haven’t made any updates is because as far as I know the plugin doesn’t need any. If that’s no longer true, then I need users to tell me about the errors they’re encountering so that I can be aware of those issues. This is open source software, which means it’s everyone’s responsibility including the users of the software to do their part in maintaining it. That means you.
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Subresource Integrity (SRI) Manager] Errors after updateWhat happens if you delete the existing hashes and let the plug-in regenerate new ones?
Forum: Plugins
In reply to: [Subresource Integrity (SRI) Manager] Plugin Update?Oddly enough there was a plugin update available for the plugin moments ago and now it works correctly, so thanks for patching the issue.
Huh! This update wasn’t supposed to change any behavior. And it didn’t on my test sites. If you’re seeing new (and better/more expected) behavior after this update, that means my update here coincidentally fixed a bug I did not know existed and that has not been reported or at least not reported clearly enough to be isolated.
To be specific: the update streamlined a function called
filterTagsthat was written years ago. Your post prompted me to update it so that it more closely followed the function signatures of the two WordPress core hooks it was designed to use. That process involved streamlining the function and removing some unnecessary (and buggy, apparently?) code.Regardless, you have my apologies for probably incorrectly assuming the situation you encountered was the same as the many dozens of other people reported before today in this particular case. That said, I’d urge you to consider providing meaningful bug reports in the future and doing the legwork to at least demonstrate that you’re not just mindlessly repeating the claims of dozens upon dozens of others that are recorded here. You didn’t do that, and I’m not likely to change my approach to similar postings of yours in the future unless and until you change that initial behavior, first.
Finally, I’d be curious to have a look at your site to see what’s changed. Again, notably, you provided no links or other materials that would have given me any way to verify, test, or otherwise analyze any of the claims in your posts. Not even a link to your site, which is explicitly something that the instructions for filling out a support request on this forum asked you for. As you may know, you’re far more likely to get more help when you do provide some actually usable information.