williampatton
Forum Replies Created
-
Closing the loop here to say that we discovered this was a browser level cache that was not clearing alongside the other caches that were cleared. A fix to enhance this will be released in the future but it seems as if it is not a widespread issue with all browsers and caches.
I will test with Vivaldi browser and see if the results are different for me.
I repled to the screenshot email but keeping the conversation here as well for posterity. I would like to know if the issue is still detected if you scan the page from inside the admin editor instead of through the frontend highlighter. I have a theory about a possible cause which could help be confirmed if the issue is NOT detected when scanned from the editor.
Got it, I am still trying to work out how the issue might be happening for you here but am continuing to look into it.
If you could send me the screenshot to (email removed as screenshot was recieved) that would be great.
- This reply was modified 1 month ago by williampatton.
@raygulick that’s what I expected about how you were running the scan. We were aware that the scanner could find this and we made updates to to account for it. I can’t replicate it on fresh install of the update however if the previous scan javascript file was cached on your server or in your browser that would explain this.
Do you have a caching plugin on the site? If so could you try to flush it and retest to see if the issue goes away?
Hi again @raygulick,
I have just tested this on my side and I don’t see the aria-hidden flagged on this icon at all when I scan from the editor or when I scan from the button on the frontend highlighter itself. Can you let me know how you scanned the pages to get this to be flagged on your site?
Hey @raygulick,
Thanks for reporting this, the icon inside the widget is intended to be hidden from screen readers as it is a visual presenteation element only so aria-hidden is appropriate on that.
That being said it shouldn’t flag as a warning on your pages. I will see about getting that resolved.
Hey @karenrbnt ,
Sorry that you are running into an issue here. We recently built an updated block editor sidebar which sounds like what you are seeing.
If you want to return to the metabox under the content you can visit the options page, scroll towards the bottom and uncheck the
Block Editor Metaboxsetting.Let me know if that gets things back for you or not.
- This reply was modified 2 months ago by williampatton.
Thanks for pointing out where you seen these. The ‘How to fix it’ does look like a string that we missed. The ‘Error’ and ‘Warning’ one though is a value that comes from the database which is why it wasn’t noticed.
These strings should be updated in the next plugin release to be translatable. Thanks for catching this.Once I have the code done on my side and confirmed to merge for next release (probably tomorrow) I will mark this thread as resolved and let you know.
We do our releases roughly every 2 weeks. Typically on Tuesdays. Tuesday next week is our next release window.
And thank you so much for the offer of improved translations. I will keep an eye on glotpress and if you submit the improved strings I will backmerge them into our repo so they override our current ones.
Hey @pizzadeliveryguy,
Thank you for highlighting this, we do have some plugin code changes scheduled for release soon that makes a few more of the strings translatable.
If you let me know where you see these strings that aren’t translatable in the current version I can be sure to double check and make sure we caught those and they are translatable. Was it in the frontend highlighter?
As far as how you can provide improved translations – we would love to get improved translations from you for Slovenian. Do you know how glotpress works on ww.wp.xz.cn? If not you could email me the po/mo files directly using a contact form on our website, let me know if you would prefer to do that and I will get you a link to a form you can use.Hi again @sfin100m
Since you have the pro plugin installed as well, it will be best if you contact support through the pro plugin and get into our normal ticket system. You should be able to get to the pro support form from the main plugin page in your admin.
Hey @sfin100,
Sorry you are having an issue here. We shouldn’t be double finding the same issue. Can you share with me a copy of 2 of the markup snippets so we can compare if there is anything unique in each of them.
If they are unique though the old one should go away and it’s weird that it doesn’t.
I will need to dig in a little more to see what is up here but seeing a pair of discovered issues side by side would help me a lot of workign out what the cause may be.
Thank you so much for using our plugin and sharing the feedback.
I totally get how ignores being reset would be frustraiting for you. That really shouldn’t be happening and I would like to understand why and try get a solution for that to you. Since this is a review, and not a support ticket if you want to dig in with me about that then openeing a support thread would be good.
You mention the ignore log – which is a pro feature. We can only discuss the features of the free plugin in these forumns however if you have the pro plugin you can reach out through those support channels and we can dig in there on pro features with you.Hey Peter,
After a lot of testing and internal discussions we ended up thinking it is best to not modify an existing rule to solve for this. If we change things here to solve this for this use case it will mean that thigns like mobile menus won’t be checked appropriately.
The only solution I have for you just now is to suggest ignoring the issue when it shows up. I know that this means having to ignore them on every page but I don’t have a better solution just now.
I may be able to offer you a more robust filter backed solution in the not too far out future.I don’t have a firm date on that but you can follow our development on github if you are interested: https://github.com/equalizedigital/accessibility-checker
Sorry that this isn’t a good solution for you but I don’t think there is a better solve for this specific problem that I can give you just now other than ignoring them.Hi Peter
I spent some time looking into this more yesterday and I can replicate what you see now.
In the past I have made the choice explicitly to test buttons for empty even when they are hidden via
aria-hiddenbecause interactive elements are still focusable even when they havearia-hiddenassigned. I did not make considerations at that time for buttons inside containers that are hidden though.I will look into what it will take to exclude those from inside hidden containers and decide if we do want to release that change (because in my mind checking contents that exists on a page and could have their visibility changed might still be better than missing potential issues if they are skipped due to initial state alone).
As an asside it might also be a good idea to consider an alternative lightbox script. Colorbox was arhived by the repo owner earlier this year and hasn’t had any update other than string fixes since 2016.
Thanks so much, Alex. These reviews mean a lot to us! If we can help with anything, please let us know.
And happy Holidays if you are celebrating this week!