Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)
  • thanks for hint. I didnt know i have to delete/update the schedule, to activate the fix (it was not mentioned in the release letter). I am using free version, there is no option for delete backup schedule. Now, based on your kind advice – i did following:

    • I have deactivated the “Enable backup schedule”
    • I have changed schedule (from 24r to 12hr, save, from 12hr to 24hr, save)
    • I have activated the “Enable backup schedule”, to google drive

    I guess it will work now, i will report back here. Many thanks

    Issue is still happening. I have version 0.9.119 installed, and yesterday (=night from sunday to monday) backup failed, with exactly same log:

    [2025-09-15 02:06:27][notice]Upload Google_Service_Exception, A exception (WPvivid_Google_Service_Exception) occurred {

    "error": {

    "code": 403,

    "message": "Quota exceeded for quota metric 'Queries' and limit 'Queries per minute' of service 'drive.googleapis.com' for consumer 'project_number:134809148507'.",

    "errors": [

    {

    "message": "Quota exceeded for quota metric 'Queries' and limit 'Queries per minute' of service 'drive.googleapis.com' for consumer 'project_number:134809148507'.",

    "domain": "usageLimits",

    "reason": "rateLimitExceeded"

    }

    ],

    "status": "PERMISSION_DENIED",

    Thread Starter vasek608

    (@vasek608)

    Hi, many thanks for explanation, now it is clear.

    Then “Display user information if logged in” is not the best wording, as it is a bit misleading.
    In my original case (I dont generate subcribers from WP users automatically), and I thought that “register for newsletter” widget will pre-fill the WP user information (if user is logged in), so users do not have to type in again their email & name when registering as subscribers, as these are already known to WP (=from logged in WP user session).

    After your explanation I see that my test WP user was already established as subcriber, hence the name/email displays in the widget.
    Proper parameter naming would be “Display subscriber information if logged in”, but that is a minor (and can be tweak individually via custom label).

    Appart from label naming – no other issue and ticket can be closed..

    (and many thanks for your prompt reply and trully great product!)

    • This reply was modified 1 year, 3 months ago by vasek608.
    • This reply was modified 1 year, 3 months ago by vasek608.
    • This reply was modified 1 year, 3 months ago by vasek608.
    • This reply was modified 1 year, 3 months ago by vasek608.
    • This reply was modified 1 year, 3 months ago by vasek608.

    Seems still an issue, even in 5.6.2 plugin version. I had to manually change 5.6.0 to 8.6.0 in the code, which helps. Should be imho in some official release.

    • This reply was modified 1 year, 7 months ago by vasek608.

    Please any update on the reported issue? I have tested the plugin on my 5 wordpress installations and it worked only on one.
    All of them are running php 7.4.33 (ie. even the one where plugin works ok(!), so php 7.4.33 itself might not be the culprit). Perhaps plugin requires some php component, which is sometimes installed/activated on server (and sometimes not)? If so, please which php component is required (so I can activate it in server parameters)?

    Many thanks

    Error:

    2023-11-14T22:28:09+00:00 CRITICAL Uncaught Error: Call to undefined function wp_cache_supports() in /home/mysite/domains/mysite.ch/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wpbenchmark/class.wpbenchmarkio.php:1193 Stack trace: #0 /home/mysite/domains/mysite.ch/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wpbenchmark/class.wpbenchmarkio.php(459): wpbenchmarkio->local_wp_cache_flush() #1 /home/mysite/domains/mysite.ch/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wpbenchmark/class.wpbenchmarkio.php(448): wpbenchmarkio->reset_and_prepare_object_cache() #2 /home/mysite/domains/mysite.ch/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wpbenchmark/class.wpbenchmarkio.php(34): wpbenchmarkio->get_initial_steps() #3 /home/mysite/domains/mysite.ch/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wpbenchmark/wp-benchmark-io.php(951): wpbenchmarkio->request_new(Array) #4 /home/mysite/domains/mysite.ch/public_html/wp-settings.php(391): include_once(‘/home/mysite/…’) #5 /home/mysite/domains/mysite.ch/public_html/wp-config.php(96): require_once(‘/home/mysite/…’) #6 /home/mysite/domains/naturau in /home/mysite/domains/mysite.ch/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wpbenchmark/class.wpbenchmarkio.php on line 1193

    Seems not 100% fixed (or issue is back), as I am on 9.5.7 version and just have experienced it too. Not annoying (happens only once in few day), but seems still happening..

    Thread Starter vasek608

    (@vasek608)

    Hi Ivan, many thanks for your ‘lightning speed’ support answer, all is clear now.
    Best regards
    Vaclav

    Thread Starter vasek608

    (@vasek608)

    Hi, thanks for your feedback, but I dont agree with you that “Google has just not updated the inspection API with that data.”

    I have tested the Google’s inspection API for original url:
    https://www.naturaum.ch/produkt/be-lenka-ranger-dark-brown/

    And Google’s API does contain the rich result data:

    View post on imgur.com

    The complete API response for the url is the following:

    {
      "inspectionResult": {
        "inspectionResultLink": "https://search.google.com/search-console/inspect?resource_id=https://www.naturaum.ch/&id=g2WqsmwABO1wEGA7u5BF0g&utm_medium=link&utm_source=api",
        "indexStatusResult": {
          "verdict": "PASS",
          "coverageState": "Submitted and indexed",
          "robotsTxtState": "ALLOWED",
          "indexingState": "INDEXING_ALLOWED",
          "lastCrawlTime": "2022-05-15T05:24:13Z",
          "pageFetchState": "SUCCESSFUL",
          "googleCanonical": "https://www.naturaum.ch/produkt/be-lenka-ranger-dark-brown/",
          "userCanonical": "https://www.naturaum.ch/produkt/be-lenka-ranger-dark-brown/",
          "sitemap": [
            "https://www.naturaum.ch/sitemap_index.xml"
          ],
          "crawledAs": "MOBILE"
        },
        "mobileUsabilityResult": {
          "verdict": "PASS"
        },
        "richResultsResult": {
          "verdict": "PARTIAL",
          "detectedItems": [
            {
              "richResultType": "Breadcrumbs",
              "items": [
                {
                  "name": "Unnamed item"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "richResultType": "Products",
              "items": [
                {
                  "name": "BE LENKA - RANGER DARK BROWN",
                  "issues": [
                    {
                      "issueMessage": "Missing field \"sku\"",
                      "severity": "WARNING"
                    },
                    {
                      "issueMessage": "Missing field \"review\"",
                      "severity": "WARNING"
                    },
                    {
                      "issueMessage": "Missing field \"aggregateRating\"",
                      "severity": "WARNING"
                    },
                    {
                      "issueMessage": "No global identifier provided (e.g., gtin, mpn, isbn)",
                      "severity": "WARNING"
                    }
                  ]
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }

    The inspected URL has two valid rich schema items (Breadcrumbs & Products). There are some warnings detected on the Products schema, but only in ‘optional’ elements (which does not invalidate the schema, as per google’s documentation):

    View post on imgur.com

    So the issue seems rather on the RankMath plugin side (perhaps you only handle/show the ‘PASS’ rich schema verdict)?

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 11 months ago by vasek608.
    • This reply was modified 3 years, 11 months ago by vasek608.
    • This reply was modified 3 years, 11 months ago by vasek608.
    • This reply was modified 3 years, 11 months ago by vasek608.
    vasek608

    (@vasek608)

    What exactly do you think rankmath shouldn’t do?
    – to add a new custom field in the post
    – to process internal links
    ?
    (whether admin is online or offline is irrelevant, as in general the plugins just do what they are programmed to do (and what they have permission to do))

    Adding a custom field for plugin’s internal tracking & management of its activities is pretty common (eg. payment gateways mark orders with payment transaction details etc.)

    • This reply was modified 4 years ago by vasek608.

    Hi, as I am battling with similar issue (also in combination with PixelYourSite), I have checked your page and your statement (that “deny function works fine”) seems not correct, as the pixel cookie gets planted into client browser even all CookieYes categories are rejected:

    View post on imgur.com

    (of course I manually deleted the _fbp cookies before reloading the screen).
    So it seems even the ‘deny’ is not working..

    • This reply was modified 4 years, 3 months ago by vasek608.

    Hello, i am also experiencing the similar.
    I have both guest mode (& guest optimization) both activated, CSS combine & UCSS activated. I see CSS nicely combined in the coverage console, but I dont see any ‘considerable reduction of the unused CSS’. In my case only roughly 10% of UCSS is used (ie. 90% is unused), for the front page of my test site vac922884.cf

    Entire purge of cache doesnt help (and I have waited 10mins for async generation of UCSS). I’ve also tried without guest mode – no difference.

    LiteSpeed Cache 4.4.1.

    View post on imgur.com

    • This reply was modified 4 years, 8 months ago by vasek608.
    Thread Starter vasek608

    (@vasek608)

    Hi, thank you very much for explanation, it is clear.
    But its a pity, which also makes the MDTF plugin attractive only for smaller webshops (ie. who dont use the variations or dont need to filter via them).

    On the other hand I have to admit that also many other filtering plugins do struggle in the same area, especially when further variations criteria are applied (eg. show only ‘in stock’ variants). The only plugin that is able to handle all these costs 99usd, still stays as the only option. (but will check your plugin every few years, just to see whether it stays like that (as I like your GUI much much more)).

    Topic can be closed, many thanks again!

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 2 months ago by vasek608.
    Thread Starter vasek608

    (@vasek608)

    Hello Darko, many thanks for your feedback and sharing with us your plans. I am tensely looking forward to your new version, as the current alternatives are not many – it is basically either official addition from polylang or one free plugin (which currently still kind of work, bit with a bit unclear future).
    Best regards

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 6 months ago by vasek608.
    Thread Starter vasek608

    (@vasek608)

    Hello,
    many thanks for your fast action. I confirm my account now shows again 10 pull zones, the topic is correctly closed as resolved.
    Best regards

    Thread Starter vasek608

    (@vasek608)

    For other users:
    the topic was also discussed here – https://www.prodesigns.com/wordpress-themes/support/topic/breadcrumbs-missing-field-item

    Advised temporary solution (as proposed by the theme creator) works ok, requires certain field/code modification (but quite easily doable).
    I guess the proper solution will arrive with some future theme release, so nothing else expected from support about this point till then.
    Many thank!

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 8 months ago by vasek608.
Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)