vireev

I wrote to the indicated address. As soon as I have information, I will write here and change the status of the ticket. So far, the problem is relevant

I have answered all these questions, I will not write the same thing again. Uncode is great for SEO. Otherwise I wouldn’t have 100 out of 100 in PageSpeed Insights.
“In terms of speed performance apparently Uncode it’s not a great solution compared to Elementor?” Read carefully what I wrote about Elementor in the previous post

as for SEO, as an optimizer, I haven’t encountered any problems that would characterize Uncode as a bad choice. But equally, I can’t say that this theme is anything special in terms of SEO.
Everything you need is here, and the rest – with the help of plugins.

it is worth considering (as can be seen from this topic) that Uncode is a unique WPBakery Page Builder, which has its own advantages in creating sites, and if you compare it with Gutenberg and Elementor, then the competition will be between Gutenberg and Uncode in terms of speed and optimization, because Elementor is not about SEO.

But again, the other side of the coin: some things may not work, because a third-party plugin does not see the blocks of this constructor. But of course there are alternatives: to do everything by hand, for this there is a convenient function, and I, not getting a positive answer here, will just go and do everything by means of Uncode. It will just take a little longer and I won’t have automatic generation of content and FAQ.

Today I have 5 active projects, 2 of them on Uncode. Google’s PageSpeed numbers (75 97 83 100) mobile version, (92 97 83 100) PC. Two hundred on SEO.

Regarding images and overall site speed. It is worth understanding that the theme and the engine are only part of the story.

It’s possible to achieve perfect performance on Elementor, and it’s also possible to miss something on Gutenberg and lose the competition.

Because in addition to the theme, there is: a cloud service (I use CloudFlare) that offers options for caching, protection, etc., if not CF, then it is a plugin for caching, which are also different and offer different functions.

Images can be made using webp plugins, or you can do it yourself, as well as code optimization.

In other words: there’s a lot of room to go wrong even with an SEO-perfect theme.

Firstly, it all depends on what you know about SEO and what you focus on. You can rely on plugins, a good theme, a good choice of constructor, but not understand how to unlock this potential. And vice versa.

I can’t say that Uncode is the perfect SEO move. Maybe GP wins in terms of optimization, but… These are different products, because Uncode is powerful in its versatility, it’s great for online-store, business card sites, a constantly evolving Page Builder and Core, regular updates based on user preferences, a lot of things that can overlap those possible differences in terms of SEO parameters that may exist between it and competitors.

For example, I chose Uncode because I just liked the Demo at a certain time and place. I bought the theme and just started working with it. It doesn’t matter to me how good it is in comparison, because I already have it and everything suits me.

GL

Yeah, regarding the issue discussed here, there are changes and the image is accompanied by the correct alt and title. The fact that the image title is taken from the Page Title is normal. Thank you

ok, nice. the problem is completely solved and will make this plugin more useful. so these changes should be expected in the next update?

I find a xml file in rank-math uploads directory and delete string with that gallery. solved. But that is not the nice way