weslleysim

The problem has been solved! I believe it was something related to the browser. Thank you very much!

So is the issue resolved? Can I continue using the low-resource scan? I found 11 minutes to be a very satisfactory time, even for this scan mode.

And thank you very much for your help!

• This reply was modified 5 months ago by weslleysim.

Hey, I’ve just sent you the report as requested, using my username from here.

Just as a reminder, this Wordfence setup is the second or third installation, including table removal, as I was investigating the slow scan issue. It is currently running in learning mode until tomorrow.

Before the last low-resource scan — which took about 6 hours to complete — the only changes I made were the following:

• I manually set the scan time limit to 3600 seconds (10 hours), since I wasn’t sure how long the scan would take to finish.
• I set the maximum execution time for each scan stage to 30.

———

I’m not sure if this is relevant, but I’m sharing some I/O data from the past 30 days for reference.

IMAGE HERE

As mentioned earlier, after deleting the “potential threat”, which later appeared to be a false positive, I ran a standard scan, which completed quickly and didn’t report any new issues. After that, I ran a more advanced Wordfence scan, which also finished in a reasonable amount of time and did not flag anything serious.

However, a few hours later, out of an abundance of caution, I ran a third scan. That’s when I noticed it was taking significantly longer than usual, and this behavior has persisted ever since. The scan speed only returned to normal temporarily after reinstalling the plugin with table removal, but shortly afterward, it slowed down again.

• This reply was modified 5 months ago by weslleysim.

I’m not sure, but apparently, what Wordfence found related to LiteSpeed ​​was a potential false positive? (The issue of slow scanning remains).

Okay, I’ve done a lot of testing, and I can provide you with a wide variety of information:

1. When I make new posts on my website, and use the howto block, the “howto” schema is identified by Google Rich Result.

2. When I created copies of my original tutorial post, obviously with new dates, in this case today, the “howto” schema was identified in Google rich results.

3. When I edited other already published posts, and added the howto block, Google was able to identify the “howto” schema in those posts.

4. I edited my original tutorial post in multiple ways, and nothing makes Google rich results identify the “howto” schema.

5. I changed the link to my original tutorial post, and even with a new link, it did not identify the “howto” schema post.

6. Apparently, google rich results no longer displays the “howto” schema on the first page of the result, or has it always been like this, and I don’t remember? I say this because I was only able to find the “type” data referring to the “howto” schema when I clicked on “article” in the rich results, and then I viewed the “article” schema data, and within it I found the “howto” data ” schema.

The problem is that if I don’t use the “article” schema or any other (I haven’t tested it), the data from the “howto” schema will not appear anywhere in the result, so I thought: the howto schema is now conditioned to the article schema or others? – obviously, this question has to do with new posts, and has no relation to the post I’m having problems with and the howto schema doesn’t appear anyway.

I made new posts only with the “howto” schema, and the howto structured data did not appear in Google rich results. They only appeared if I added the schema article, then the howto data was inside the article in Google test results.

Here an image: https://i.imgur.com/NN6Zj5M.jpeg

7. Although my original tutorial post does not present the howto schema in Google tests, on validator.schema.org, the howto schema appears in the results. You can see it in the photo, or test it for yourself with the link in the post:

View post on imgur.com

The link to the post i’m always talk about and I can’t see the howto data in google rich results:

https://simstime.net/2020/06/15/como-colocar-metade-do-piso-no-the-sims-4/

8.

Finally, something curious.

Do you remember that I said that I made several new test posts, and in them the “howto” schema appeared, but inside “article”? So!

I tested the link to this test post on schema.org, and there, the result appeared different from my tutorial post also tested on shema.org. In it, only one schema box appears, in this case article, and inside it, there is the data from the article schema, and also the “howto” schema, all within the same box.

View post on imgur.com

View post on imgur.com

————————

I’m so confused! I don’t understand why the howto data doesn’t appear in my tutorial post in the google test, but it appears in schema.org, in separate boxes.

And I don’t understand why the howto data is appearing in other posts, but within the article.

Help me understand.

Thank you for all the information, you clarified everything I needed!

I’ve just performed a test on a 7.3 php staging version of my web site, which is not on my servers, but on BlogVault’s servers (a backup and staging service), and the error persists in the stagging. When I upload the Filebird 5.1.2 file and having activated it, the above mentioned error occurs as well.

I created a new staging version of my site on the BlogVault servers, this time in php version 7.4, and in this version, Filebird 5.1.2 could be successfully activated without any errors.

Does this mean Filebird no longer works on php 7.3 versions?

It helped! Thank you for the informations!